So here's the question: Why is it that Republicans along with
their 'pro-life', talk-radio propagandists
favor not just waterboarding but the death penalty ?
Regional data demonstrate that the modern American death
penalty has its origins in racial terror and is, in the words of [Steven B] Bright, the legal scholar,
"a direct descendant of lynching." Bryan Stevenson: NY Review of Books (7/13/2017)
The few states where the death penalty is actively practiced are overwhelmingly red, which may explain why the United States attorney general, William P. Barr, announced last month that the federal government, which has not carried out an execution since 2003, will resume putting inmates to death in December. Little surprise that at a time when new death sentences are near historic lows,
Tennessee is executing people at a precipitous rate.
What Part of ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ Don’t We Understand?
"We do not expect to live in a culture where murder does not exist; we
do demand that it not be legal." Albert Camus
Our insistence on applying the death penalty to
international terrorists is causing us multiple problems. The death
penalty is banned throughout Europe (and indeed, by most liberal
democracies). Our European allies, irritated by what they call a
growing American tendency to give in to a "unilateralist
temptation," see yet another example in our insistence on employing
the death penalty against international terrorists extradited from
abroad. Because of its opposition to the death penalty, the
European Parliament has prohibited extradition of terrorists to the
United States for trial without a commitment to waive capital
punishment. The United Kingdom, our closest ally on most matters
related to national security, has put the United States on notice
that British soldiers will not turn bin Laden over to the United
States if they manage to capture him, unless the death penalty is
waived. Spain is refusing to extradite eight suspected terrorists
without assurance that the death penalty will not be imposed.
Jessica Stern's book "Terror
in the Name of God".
It may come as a surprise to many to learn that Japan, a nation associated with tranquil temples and modernity, still has the death penalty.
Indeed, it is one of just a handful of states considered to be "industrialized" that still executes criminals, the others being the US,
Singapore and Taiwan. The Telegraph
(See the map.)
Attorney General Barr has presided over an unprecedented spree of federal executions this year. He’s got at least three more people lined up for executions during the “lame-duck” period. Why did the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast grant Barr an award for “Christlike behavior”?
George W. Bush during his six years as
governor of Texas presided over 152 executions, more than any other
governor in the recent history of the United States. Still
Republicans nominated him and we are all paying the price.
Republicans at the very top spawned Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, waterboarding, secret prisons, and
other lawless 'justice'. The US now has the highest
rate of incarcerations in the world.
Not to be outdone...Rick
Perry, as Governor of Texas, has overseen 234 executions since
he took office in 2000. Republicans cheered for that. They are
'pro-life'...they say.
Republicans
are only pro-life for the unborn, they tend to favor the death penalty,
and now they are defending torture.
To be silent is to be an accessory
to these crimes.
Both the Ct
House and Senate passed a bill to abolish the death
penalty. Ct GovernorRell, a
true Republican,
vetoed It. But Connecticut finally repealed capital
puishment in 2012.
The death penalty does not save money.
It
is no
deterrent. It is
error prone. It is vengeful, but satisfies no one. Because of
US continued use of the death penalty, advanced countries refuse to
extradite to us. The Declaration of Independence reads "a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation." But
Republicans don't respect international
law.
This is what is wrong with the death penalty:
Despite years of appeals, important evidence sometimes never gets a
hearing. Mistakes go uncorrected, and doubts about guilt are not
addressed. Executing someone where such doubts about his guilt
remain unresolved undermines public confidence in our justice
system. Responsible public officials should not allow
that.
was convicted of shooting police officer Mark
Allen MacPhail, but only on the basis of witness testimony. Most of
the witnesses have since recanted, many alleging that police
coerced them into making false statements.
On May 20, twenty-seven former judges and
prosecutors from across the political spectrum filed an
amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Georgia
death row inmate Troy Davis. Signers of the
amicus brief include Larry Thompson (Deputy
Attorney General of the United States, 2001-2003), former
Congressman Bob Barr (R-GA; U.S. Attorney for the
Northern District of Georgia, 1986-1990); William S.
Sessions (Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
1987-1993), and John Gibbons (former Chief Judge
of the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit). Their brief
urges the Court to order an evidentiary hearing in District Court,
arguing that “Mr. Davis’ petition for an original writ
meets this Court’s exceptional circumstances test because Mr.
Davis can make an extraordinary showing through new, never reviewed
evidence that strongly points to his innocence, and thus his
execution would violate the Constitution.” Davis’
attorneys filed a writ of habeas corpus with the Court, pursuant to
its original jurisdiction, asking for the same hearing. Davis
has a significant amount of new evidence pointing to his innocence
that has never been fully reviewed in court. He was sentenced
to death primarily on eyewitness testimony, but 7 of the 9
eyewitnesses have recanted their testimony and some evidence points
to one of the two remaining witnesses as the person who committed
the murder. The amicus brief may be read here and
the original writ of habeas corpus may be read here.
In the end, the execution of Troy Davis would
solve nothing. It would only add to the pain of everyone involved,
and destroy public faith in Georgia’s ability to administer
justice fairly. Georgia officials should do the right thing and
make sure the execution of Troy Davis does not proceed.
Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital
Punishment? The Experts on Both Sides Make Their Best Case,
Hugo Adam Bedau and Paul G. Cassell, editors, Oxford, 2004;
The Death Penalty: An American History by Stuart
Banner, Harvard, 2003; The Contradictions of American Capital
Punishment, by Franklin E. Zimring, Oxford, 2003.