Trump’s economic war with Iran threatens an even larger conflict.
Before the world’s eyes, he is attempting to strangle the Iranian economy by cutting off its foreign-exchange earnings through sanctions on any firm, US or otherwise, that does business with the country. Such sanctions are tantamount to war, in violation of the United Nations Charter. And, because they are aimed directly at the civilian population, they constitute, or at least should constitute, a crime against humanity.
(Trump is pursuing essentially the same strategy against the Venezuelan government and people.)
Jeffrey Sachs (economist) 8/20/2019
FYI when you’re reading paranoid critics of Biden’s breakthrough to free our hostages in Iran, know this: there is a whole industry in Washington that wants war with Iran and will oppose any diplomacy or deescalation. Their criticism isn’t on the level. They have an agenda.
What we are seeing now is the conservative
message machine preparing the country to accept the ideas of a nuclear war
and nation destruction against Iran. The technique used is
the "slippery slope." It is done by degrees. Like the proverbial
frog in the pot of water – if the heat is turned up slowly
the frog gets used to the heat and eventually boils to death
– the American public is getting gradually acclimated to the
idea of war with Iran." Evan
...when you look back through history, you can see that even
where the CIA, I’m going to use the word in quotation marks, “successfully”
influenced foreign elections, almost uniformly, those have turned out
to be disasters over the long term. We still had never recovered. At
least our policy has never recovered from the Mossadegh overthrow in
the Iran in the 1950s. Look at Latin America, it’s still a mess,
largely because what the CIA has done there over the years, even in
Greece where the CIA, it wasn’t an election, but the CIA supported the
overthrow of the Greek government in 1967 by a military junta. Even in
Greece, people still hate and distrust the United States because of
that. It’s like the CIA does these kinds of things, they carry out
these kinds of covert action operations without any thought to
long-term policy, and like I said, uniformly, the policy has turned out
to be a disaster. John
Kiriakou
All of the 2016 Republican Presidential
candidates, with the possible exception of Ron Paul, favored war with
Iran.
Bush threatens Iran with military action
17 Jun 2008 George Bush has warned Iran that military action is
still "on the table" if it fails to respond to tightening
diplomatic pressure to abandon its nuclear weapons programme. The
EU is planning to announce the freezing of all overseas assets of
the main bank in Iran. Sanctions are also to be tightened on gas
and oil exports by Iran.
On CBS's Face the Nation,
Lieberman said, "If [the Iranians] don't play by the rules, we've
got to use our force, and to me, that would include taking military
action to stop them from doing what they're doing."
Fearing Escalation, Pentagon Fought Cheney Iran
Plan 06 Jun 2008 Pentagon officials firmly opposed a
proposal by Vice President [sic] Dick Cheney last summer for
airstrikes against Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) bases
by insisting that the administration would have to make clear
decisions about how far the United States would go in escalating
the conflict with Iran, according to a former George W. Bush
administration official. J. Scott Carpenter, who was then deputy
assistant secretary of state in the State Department's Bureau of
Near Eastern Affairs, recalled in an interview that senior Defence
Department (DoD) officials and the Joint Chiefs used the escalation
issue as the main argument against the Cheney proposal.
First, describe Iran as evil – part of the axis of evil.
An inherently evil person will inevitably do evil things and can't
be negotiated with. An entire evil nation is a threat to other
nations.
Second, describe Iran's leader as a "Hitler" who is
inherently
"evil" and cannot be reasoned with. Refuse to negotiate with
him.
Then repeat the lie that Iran is on the verge of having
nuclear
weapons —weapons of mass destruction. IAEA Director General
Mohamed ElBaradei says they are at best many years away.
Call nuclear development "an existential threat" – a
threat to our very existence.
Then suggest a single "surgical" "attack" on Natanz and
make it
seem acceptable.
Then find a reason to call the attack "self-defense" — or
better protection for our troops from the EFP's, or single-shot
canister bombs.
Claim, without proof and without anyone even taking
responsibility for the claim, that the Iranian government at its
highest level is supplying deadly weapons to Shiite militias
attacking our troops, while not mentioning the fact that Saudi
Arabia is helping Sunni insurgents attacking our troops.
Give "protecting our troops" as a reason for attacking Iran
without getting new authorization from Congress. Claim that the old
authorization for attacking Iraq implied doing "whatever is
necessary to protect our troops" from Iranian intervention in
Iraq.
Argue that de-escalation in Iraq would "bleed" our troops,
"weaken" America, and lead to defeat. This sets up escalation as a
winning policy, if not in Iraq then in Iran.
Get the press to go along with each step.
Never mention the words "preventive nuclear war" or
"national destruction." When asked, say "All options are on
the table." Keep the issue of nuclear war and its
consequences from being seriously discussed by the national
media.
Intimidate Democratic presidential candidates into
agreeing,
without using the words, that nuclear war should be "on the table."
This makes nuclear war and nation destruction
bipartisan and even more acceptable.
ICYMI: Ronald Regan made a secret deal with Iran to hold onto US hostages until he got elected. Then he ran on it & President Jimmy Carter lost. Then came Iran Contra scandal. Regan was guilty as sin of treason. That was after Nixon. Republicans been dirty since way back. pic.twitter.com/5dzjNF4ELY
We can attack Iran, says US
commander 20 Oct 2007 America's top military officer
said the country does have the resources to attack Iran, despite
the strain of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Adm Michael Mullen, who
took over as chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff three weeks
ago, said diplomacy remained the priority in dealing with Iran's
suspected plans to develop a nuclear weapon and its [alleged]
support for anti-US 'insurgents' in Iraq. But at a press conference
he said: "there is more than enough reserve to respond
(militarily) if that, in fact, is what the national leadership
wanted to do".
Shifting Targets --The Administration's
plan for Iran By Seymour M. Hersh 08 Oct 2007 The revised
bombing plan for a possible attack, with its tightened focus on
counterterrorism, is gathering support among generals and admirals
in the Pentagon. The strategy calls for the use of sea-launched
cruise missiles and more precisely targeted ground attacks and
bombing strikes, including plans to destroy the most important
Revolutionary Guard training camps, supply depots, and command and
control facilities. "Cheney's option is now for a fast in and
out—for surgical strikes," the former senior American
intelligence official told me... A Pentagon consultant on
counterterrorism told me that, if the bombing campaign took place,
it would be accompanied by a series of what he called "short, sharp
incursions" by American Special Forces units into suspected Iranian
training sites. He said, "Cheney is devoted to this, no
question."
US garners support for strike on Iran 02
Oct 2007 Australia, Britain and Israel have reportedly "expressed
interest" in a US campaign to launch surgical bombing raids on Iran
targeting Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities. A report in The New Yorker by the
journalist Seymour Hersh said the Bush Administration had stopped
trying to justify a campaign against Iran on the basis of
curtailing Iran's nuclear ambitions. It is instead redefining the
war in Iraq as a strategic battle between the US and
Iran.
US 'planning surgical Iran strikes' 01 Oct
2007 Australia, Britain and Israel have "expressed interest" in a
US campaign to launch "surgical" bombing raids on Iran targetting
the Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities, according to one of America's leading
investigative reporters, Seymour
Hersh.
How Cheney Cooked
the Intelligence on Iran
Dick Cheney has been
trying to pressure intelligence analysts who have not drunk the
neocon kool-aid on Iran to go along with his line on the issues at
stake in a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran that the White
House has been holding up for more than a
year.
(August 9, 2007) At a news conference Thursday, Bush said Iran
had been warned of unspecified consequences if it continued its
alleged support for anti-American forces in Iraq. U.S. Ambassador
to Iraq Ryan Crocker had conveyed the warning in meetings with his
Iranian counterpart in Baghdad, the president said. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/18834.html
According to Seymour
Hersh, Bush and Cheny have already launched pre-war operations in Iran with money
illegally taken from
elsewhere, exactly as they began the current war in Iraq over four
years ago.
Even more incredibly, Hersh
reports Bush and Cheney are funneling the money to Al Qaeda
groups - the very
terrorists who murdered nearly 3,000 Americans on September 11,
whose destruction has allegedly been the ultimate goal of the Bush
Administration ever since.
Iran was our ally after 9/11
and helped us drive the Taliban out of Afghanistan. In
2003, Iran sent a letter to Bush through the Swiss ambassador and Rep. Bob Ney
(R-OH) offering far-reaching compromises on its nuclear program,
relations with Hezbollah and Hamas and support for a Palestinian
peace agreement with Israel. Yet Cheney rejected the offer and even
reprimanded the Swiss ambassador for sending it.
Now Bush is accusing Iran of
arming Iraqi insurgents, but evidence to the contrary is piling up. Here's a growing collection of lies about Iran by
the
White House. And here are simple talking points for opponents of this looming war.
Sign the Petition. This
petition has over 99,000 signatures. If you send it to everyone you
know, it will top 100,000 this week: http://www.dontattackiran.org
With two aircraft carrier groups in the Persian Gulf, Bush
could bomb Iran on a moment's notice. If Bush administration bombs
Iran despite our efforts, we will respond. And we will hold
Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and John Conyers to their commitments
to pursue impeachment if Bush and Cheney attack Iran: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/iranresponse
Daniel Ellsberg, of "Pentagon Papers" fame, told Democracy
Now that he believes Bush plans to attack Iran, probably without
informing Congress. Ellsberg says a similar escalation happened
during the Vietnam War, when the battlefield was extended into Laos
and Cambodia. Could this be possible?
The analogy is correct. I think this president is looking to
expand the war. His comments about Iran and Syria were not
conciliatory. He's rattling the saber at a time when saber-rattling
hurts our troops. It's the kind of tough talk that dragged us into
this war, the same braggadocio that doesn't pass for statecraft,
but shows an administration that's out of control. Here's a
president who's putting his foot on the accelerator as the car
heads toward the cliff. http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/48535/
Regime Change Is the Reason, Disarmament the Excuse
An interview with Scott Ritter by Scott Horton Interviewed February
20, 2007 – Listen
to
the interview.
Second American Aircraft Carrier Heads to Persian Gulf.
Interview with Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian-
American Council, conducted by Scott HarrisScript
summary/Related links
US Sending Third Carrier Strike Group to Persian Gulf http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021107B.shtml
The Iranians have reason to feel paranoid. At least one former
White House official contends that some Bush advisers secretly want
an excuse to attack Iran. A second Navy carrier group is steaming
toward the Persian Gulf, and a third carrier will likely
follow.
02/24/07 "The Telegraph" -- -- Israel is negotiating with the
United States for permission to fly over Iraq as part of a plan to
attack Iran's nuclear facilities, The Daily Telegraph can
reveal.
The Coming Attack on Iran
Paul
Craig Roberts
The US media is totally unreliable. It cannot go against Israel,
and it will wrap itself in the flag just as it did for the invasion
of Iraq. The American public has been deceived (again) and believes
that Iran is on the verge of possessing nuclear armaments to be
used to wipe Israel off the map. http://tinyurl.com/w7xve
Some
powerful forces are eager for talks with Iran to collapse --
so the U.S. military will attack Iran.If
peace is not pursued, momentum will build toward war.
The United States has been at similar crossroads before. With
horrific results, U.S. leaders bypassed alternatives and pursued
war in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.