"Only in economics is endless expansion seen as a virtue.
In biology it is called cancer" Growth Delusion: David Pilling
Earth Overshoot Day marks the date when humanity’s demand for ecological resources and services in a given year exceeds what Earth can regenerate in that year.
In 2021, it fell on July 29. https://www.overshootday.org/
“We ran the model forward to the year 2040, along a
business-as-usual trajectory based on ‘do-nothing’ trends — that is,
without any feedback loops that would change the underlying trend. The
results show that based on plausible climate trends, and a total
failure to change course, the global food supply system would face
catastrophic losses, and an unprecedented epidemic of food riots. In
this scenario, global society essentially collapses as food production
falls permanently short of consumption.” UK
Government-backed Scientific Model Flags Risk of Civilization’s Collapse by 2040
...the costs
of climate change, if not addressed, will be equivalent to losing 5
percent (and potentially as much as 20 percent) of the global gross
domestic product (GDP) each year, now and forever." Hundreds
of millions of people could be threatened with hunger, water
shortages, and severe economic deprivation. "Climate change is the
greatest example of market failure we have ever seen." from the
Stern Report on the Economics of Climate Change. (updated 8/2011 in Technology Review Magazine).
Republicans are opposed to any moves toward sustainability.
A vote for them is a threat to future generations.
The 1972, “Limits to Growth” computer model and study projected a business as
usual mid century collapse would be caused by a combination of
resource depletion, overpopulation, and growing pollution resulting
in global warming. Only specific measures aimed a curbing growth and
limit population could avoid collapse.
Strong criticism
followed. “With time, the debate on the Limits book veered more and
more on the political side. In 1997, the Italian economist Giorgio
Nebbia noted that the reaction against the study had arrived from at
least four different fronts. One was from those who saw the book as a
threat to the growth of their businesses and industries. A second set
was that of professional economists, who saw it as a threat to their
dominance in advising on economic matters. The Catholic Church
provided further ammunition for the critics, being piqued at the
suggestion that overpopulation was one of the major causes of the
problems. Then, the political left in the Western World saw the study
as a scam of the ruling class, designed to trick workers into
believing that the proletarian paradise was not a practical goal. And
this is a clearly incomplete list; forgetting the political right,
the believers in infinite growth, politicians seeking for easy
solutions to all problems, and many others.”
Recent
work updated the model showing our business-as-usual mentality will
spark a decline of economic growth within the next decade, but a
total collapse by 2040. Data
updated to 2021 shows we are still on track for collapse.
Population has already outgrown the carrying capacity of the planet.
The outlook is not good. Global warming will cause climate collapse,
and most likely the destruction of the natural world.
We should be seeking a balance with nature. For example: our oxygen is generated in forests we are
fast cutting down, but it also comes from small creatures in the ocean which are threatened by
acidification.
Growth is not the answer, equitable distribution is. There are obvious limits to growth and we have already exceeded them.
To reach some kind of sustainability we will need to keep fossil fuels in the ground and convert to renewable energy.
If we don´t, we will face planet wide catastrophe as a hostile climate devastates ever more frequently, as the ecology degrades, crops fail,
food shortages widen, and the environment collapses.
"Society must cease to look upon "progress" as
something desirable. `Eternal Progress’ is a nonsensical
myth. What must be implemented is not a `steadily expanding
economy,’ but a zero growth economy, a stable economy.
Economic growth is not only unnecessary but ruinous." Alexander I.
Solzhenitsyn
Take economic growth. There is strong historical evidence that when the economy stalls, democracy fractures.
From the 1890s to the 2010s, the absence of economic growth has repeatedly fuelled the rise of populist anger.
Voters need a sense that the future will be materially better than the past if they are to resist the appeal of
politicians who tell them that the present is the fault of someone else.
The economist Benjamin Friedman has made this case most forcefully: the reason
growth matters is not for its own sake, but because the healthy functioning of democracy depends on it...
Could we step off even if we wanted to ?
How Democracy Ends: David Runciman Pg 192
In the past fifty years we've doubled our irrigated
cropland and tripled our water consumption to meet global food
demand. In the next fifty, we must double food production again. Is
there really enough water to pull that off ? In his book When the
Rivers Run Dry environmental journalist Fred Pearce
describes in vivid, firsthand detail the stark reality of impending
water crises in more than thirty countries around the globe. We now
withdraw so much water that many of our mightiest and most historic
rivers - like the Nile, the Colorado, the Yellow, the Indus - have
barely a trickle left to meet the sea. (From the World in
2050: Laurence C Smith
By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages. And ecosystems around the world will suffer even more.
WWF
It is clear that the United States has no established policies to guide interactions between government, growth, unemployment, and inflation. The need to develop long-term policies becomes ever more urgent as the country moves for the first time from a history of growth into the turbulent pressures accompanying the transition from growth to one of the many possible kinds of equilibrium. We need to choose and work toward a desirable kind of equilibrium
before we arrive at a point where the system imposes its own choice of regrettable consequences.
JAY W. FORRESTER (1995)
[Can] human-engineered social systems
from economies to cities, which have only existed for the past five thousand
years or so, continue to coexist with the ¨natural¨ biological world
from which they emerged and which has been around for several billion years.
To sustain more than 10 billion people living in harmony with the biosphere at a
standard of living and quality of life comparable to what we now have requires that we develop a deep understanding of the
principles and underlying system dynamics of this social-environmental coupling.
... It is implicitly taken for granted, and often taken as unquestioned dogma,
that as long as human beings remain inventive we will stay ahead of any impending threat by continuous
and ever more ingenious innovations. (from Scale, The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities,
Economies, and Companies by Geoffrey West.)
"But when the last war has come and every
man has been provided for, no ultimate peace is established on earth:
the power-accumulating machine, without which continual expansion
would not have been achieved, needs more material to devour in its
never-ending process. If the last victorious Commonwealth cannot proceed to
"annex the planets," it can only proceed to destroy itself in order to begin anew the
never-ending process of power generation."
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (pg 196).
Republicans often say that
'growth' can solve many of our economic problems.
Rising incomes can be favorable for openness, tolerance, and democracy,
but "these precious features are at risk if economies falter and incomes stagnate."
Benjamin M. Friedman's book "The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth".
The only limit to the damage that
the right-wing
and it's allied Republican, Tea Party, Birchers, and other fringe, radical
factions is the destruction of the habitability
of the planet. You will find some of the explanation
here of how that can happen. Technology
will be incapable of meeting the challenges. Here's the outlook.
"...we live in a world where economic growth is
generally seen as both beneficent and necessary _ the more, the
better; where past growth has brought us to a perilous state
environmentally; where we are poised for unprecedented increments
in growth; where this growth is proceeding with wildly wrong market
signals, including prices that do not incorporate environmental
costs or reflect the needs of future generations; where a failed
politics has not meaningfully corrected the routinely deploying
technology that was created in an environmentally unaware era;
where there is no hidden hand or inherent mechanism adequate to
correct the destructive tendencies. So, right now, one can only
conclude that growth is the enemy of environment. Economy and
environment remain in collision." The
Bridge at the End of the World: Gus Speth (2008)